Conflict PHP - response

Thursday, February 17th 2005, 11:17 CET

Skien, Norway

I actually got a response back, it reads as follows:

If you do not care to read it, and I assume you did not since you stated so. How can you insult it, if you know nothing about it. This author gave his opinion on what he thought could be in the future of PHP. He perceived the updates in the latest version of PHP were taking a path that was different from what the users wanted. He even quoted a Survey that backed up this information. As far as I know we do live in a free country where if we have an opinion we can voice it. You are also free to have your opinion. As for your last remark, If you read the article he just states that he was concerned that Zend could be changing PHP5 to make it more of a commercial product. He even uses the fact that Zend is offering an $800 PHP plug-in for Sun Servers, as an example. If you disagree with this article, his email is listed in his BIO so that you can discuss this with him further.

Shortlink

This article has a short URL available: https://drck.me/c-php-r-3wy

Comments

Nico Edtinger

Thursday, February 17th 2005, 11:08 UTC

Funny. The didn't look at the rating of the article. It should give them a hint how bad it is. And they don't even care to get the facts right. With such bad editors it's no wonder they're having such bad articles.

Add Comment

Name:
Email:	Will not be posted. Please leave empty instead of filling in garbage though!
Comment:	Please follow the reStructured Text format. Do not use the comment form to report issues in software, use the relevant issue tracker. I will not answer them here.
	All comments are moderated

My Amazon wishlist can be found here.

Human-Made Webring
previous | random | next

Life Line

Merge branch 'xdebug_3_5'

github:xdebug/xdebug — Nov 4th, 15:09 UTC
Merged pull request #1111

github:xdebug/xdebug — Nov 4th, 15:09 UTC
Disable 'declaration after statement' warning in zend_smart_string.h,…

github:xdebug/xdebug — Nov 4th, 14:25 UTC
Specify bicycle parkings covers

51.54° N, 0.16° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Specify street/place names to addresses

51.54° N, 0.16° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Survey housenumbers

51.54° N, 0.16° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Specify whether crosswalks have tactile paving

51.54° N, 0.16° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Specify whether roads have sidewalks

51.54° N, 0.16° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Determine whether ATM allows depositing cash

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Survey if places still exist

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Survey if places still exist

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Specify access to places

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Specify whether steps have handrails

51.54° N, 0.16° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Specify width of opening

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:33 UTC
Specify parking types

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Specify whether public transport stops have tactile paving

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Survey opening hours

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Specify step counts

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Survey tactile paving on steps

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Specify whether steps have a ramp

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Specify which way leads up for steps

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Specify path surfaces

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Specify whether there are cycleways

51.54° N, 0.17° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:32 UTC
Created an entrance

51.54° N, 0.16° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:23 UTC
Created a bicycle_parking

51.54° N, 0.16° W — osm — Nov 4th, 11:14 UTC